← Back to search
Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2018-11-09
R1022/2018-3
Contested design: 003110733-0001
CDRAppellant: holder
Outcome
Appeal inadmissible
The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible.
Show verbatim operative text(it)
Il ricorso è respinto in quanto inammissibile.
CostsEach party bears its own costs
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
FEDERAL SIGNAL VAMA, S.A.via PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Dr. Ferrán, 7, 08339 Vilassar de Dalt (Barcellona), Spagna
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
INTAV S.r.l.via PDF extraction
Italy (IT)
Via Quarto Negroni, 61, 00040 Ariccia, Italia
Represented by
Legal grounds invoked
Article 57
Argument summary
- ›The design holder (INTAV S.r.l.) filed an appeal on 4 June 2018 against the Invalidity Division's decision of 6 April 2018 declaring RCD No 003110733-0001 (vehicle signal lights) invalid.
- ›The holder failed to file the mandatory written statement of grounds within the four-month deadline prescribed by Article 57 CDR (deadline: 13 August 2018).
- ›The Board notified the holder on 21 August 2018 that the appeal would be declared inadmissible; the holder did not respond.
- ›The Board dismissed the appeal as inadmissible under Article 57 CDR and Article 35 REDC; no representation costs were awarded given no procedural activity by the invalidity applicant.
Deciding panel
- ChairTh. M. Margellos
- RapporteurM. Bra
- MemberC. Negro
- RegistrarI. Romero Conrad
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| itItalian | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |