Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2019-01-16
R0866/2017-3
Contested design: 003023712-0008
Outcome
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The invalidity applicant is ordered to bear the costs of the holder.
Show verbatim operative text(es)
1. Desestimar el recurso. 2. Ordenar que la solicitante de nulidad sufrague las costas de la titular.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
FABULOUS CIPHER, LDA.via PDF extraction
Portugal (PT)
Rua da Mabor, 104, Braga- Vilanova de Famalicâo - Lousado, 4760 813 Lousado, Portugal
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
PARFOIS - BARATA & RAMILO, S.A.via PDF extraction
Portugal (PT)
Rua do Sistelo, 755 - Lugar de Santegãos, 4435-429 Rio Tinto, Portugal
Represented by
Prior art cited (9)
Model 'Gilbert' shelf, disclosed January 2015
www.houzz.es · houzz.es · disclosed 2015-01-01
Model 'Metalica' shelf, disclosed September 2015
www.leroymerlin.es · leroymerlin.es · disclosed 2015-09-01
Model 'Hyllis' shelf, disclosed April 2014
www.ikea.com · ikea.com · disclosed 2014-04-01
Registered design UK, 30 August 2008
GB 4 008 768 · UK Intellectual Property Office · disclosed 2008-08-30
Registered design China, 3 February 2015
CN 201 530 032 703.8 · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2015-02-03
International design registration, filed 29 August 2006
WO 068 269 · WIPO · disclosed 2006-08-29
Registered design China, filed 6 July 2011
CN 201130211899.9 · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2011-07-06
Model 'Eliezer Araujo' shelf, published 22 September 2009
blog of Eliezer Araujo · disclosed 2009-09-22
Model 'Maisons du Monde' shelf, published 27 March 2016
Maisons du Monde website · disclosed 2016-03-27
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The invalidity applicant (Fabulous Cipher) appealed, arguing that the contested display shelf RCD (003 023 712-0008) lacks individual character over seven earlier designs including registered designs GB 4008768, three Chinese registrations, an international registration, and web disclosures 'Gilbert', 'Metalica', and 'Hyllis'; two new prior art models ('Eliezer Araujo' and 'Maisons du Monde') were introduced at appeal stage.
- ›The holder (Parfois) argued the new prior art was inadmissible at appeal stage, contested D7 ('Gilbert') as insufficiently proved, and contended the RCD differs from all cited designs in structure, shelf design, proportions, and bifurcation of the lower shelf.
- ›The Board excluded D7 (Gilbert: disclosure not proved) and the two new appeal-stage models; it confirmed that D1-D6 and Hyllis/Metalica are duly disclosed. Comparing the RCD against each cited design, the Board found that differences in frame geometry, shelf projection, bifurcation of the lower shelf, colour contrasts, and structural details produce distinct overall impressions for each comparison.
- ›The appeal was dismissed; none of the assessed prior designs destroys the individual character of the contested RCD; costs borne by the invalidity applicant.
Deciding panel
- ChairTh. M. Margellos
- RapporteurC. Rusconi
- MemberG. Humphreys
- RegistrarH. Dijkema
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esSpanish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |