DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003023712-0014

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2019-01-16

R0867/2017-3

Contested design: 003023712-0014

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The invalidity applicant is ordered to bear the costs of the holder.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Desestimar el recurso. 2. Ordenar que la solicitante de nulidad sufrague las costas de la titular.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

FABULOUS CIPHER, LDA.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua da Mabor, 104, Braga- Vilanova de Famalicâo - Lousado, 4760 813 Lousado, Portugal

Represented by

GARRIGUES IP, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

PARFOIS - BARATA & RAMILO, S.A.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua do Sistelo, 755 - Lugar de Santegãos, 4435-429 Rio Tinto, Portugal

Prior art cited (12)

Web disclosure

Model 'Estantería modular' (modular shelving component), published May 2012

www.grupocrisol.com · grupocrisol.com · disclosed 2012-05-01

Web disclosure

Model 'Torre expositora' (display tower), published February 2015

www.adpstore.com.au · adpstore.com.au · disclosed 2015-02-01

Web disclosureA

Model 'Fermos 1' (16-arm hanger), published October 2008

www.fermos.com · fermos.com · disclosed 2008-10-01

Web disclosureB⚠ rejected as evidence

Model 'Fermos 2' (two-arm hanger), published October 2008

www.fermos.com · fermos.com · disclosed 2008-10-01

National design

Registered design China, 18 March 2015

CN 2015 30 065 583.1 · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2015-03-18

National design

Registered design China, 20 June 2012

CN 2012 30 264 234.9 · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2012-06-20

National design

Registered design China, 20 June 2012

CN 2012 30 264 224.5 · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2012-06-20

National design

Registered design Romania, 18 December 2007

RO 2007 0672-0001 · Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trademarks · disclosed 2007-12-18

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Model 'Hunan' display rack, published 13 April 2014

www.hnzhongchu.com · hnzhongchu.com · disclosed 2014-04-13

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Model 'JDZJ' display rack, published 17 March 2013

www.JDZJ.com · JDZJ.com · disclosed 2013-03-17

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Model 'Grand' display rack, published 3 August 2015

www.grand-benedicts.com · grand-benedicts.com · disclosed 2015-08-03

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Model 'Denizli' display rack, published 13 August 2015

www.denizligrup.com · denizligrup.com · disclosed 2015-08-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6Article 5Article 63

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant (Fabulous Cipher) appealed the dismissal of its invalidity application against a sales display hanger RCD (003 023 712-0014), arguing the contested design lacks individual character over prior hanger/display stand models; four additional models (Hunan, JDZJ, Grand, Denizli) were introduced at appeal stage; the applicant also challenged the exclusion of 'Fermos 1' and 'Fermos 2' for insufficient disclosure proof.
  • The holder (Parfois) opposed admission of the four new prior art models as inadmissible at appeal stage and argued that differences in base design, number and arrangement of arms, and overall configuration produce distinct overall impressions.
  • The Board admitted Fermos 1 (16-arm hanger, disclosure proved via online catalogue printout) but excluded Fermos 2 (disclosure not sufficiently proved) and the four new appeal-stage models. Comparing the RCD against each admitted prior design, the Board found systematic structural differences (T-shaped vs X/cross-shaped base, single vs multiple uprights, bidirectional vs multidirectional arms) produce clearly distinct overall impressions.
  • The appeal was dismissed; none of the assessed prior designs destroys the individual character of the contested RCD; costs borne by the invalidity applicant.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurC. Rusconi
  • MemberG. Humphreys
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗