DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002457341-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2019-11-21

R0070/2019-3

Contested design: 002457341-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The appeal is upheld; the contested decision is annulled; RCD No 2 457 341-0001 is declared invalid; the design holder bears the invalidity applicant's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

Annuls the contested decision; Declares the Registered Community Design No 2 457 341-0001 invalid; Orders that the design holder bear the invalidity applicant's costs in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

4-Shisha GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Im Hesselbruch 2, 45356 Essen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

nextro GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Bahnhof-Umgebung 17a, 6170 Zirl, Austria

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1⚠ rejected as evidence

AK-47 shaped hookah published on Facebook by Illuziah Hookah

Facebook (Illuziah Hookah page) · disclosed 2013-12-08

Prior useD2

AK-47 shaped hookah exhibited by 'Illuzia' at the Tobacco Plus Convenience Expo, Las Vegas

Tobacco Plus Convenience Expo (TPC), Las Vegas, January 2014 · disclosed 2014-01-30

OtherD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Kalashnikov rifle (AK-47) — Wikipedia and YouTube video extract

Wikipedia / YouTube · disclosed 2008-03-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)Article 7(2)Article 63(2)Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant (appellant) argued that prior design D2 (AK-47 shaped hookah) was publicly exhibited at the TPC trade fair in Las Vegas in January 2014, producing the same overall impression as the contested RCD, relying on photographs, flight booking records, passport stamps and two affidavits.
  • The design holder argued the Facebook screenshots were unreliable, that D3 (Kalashnikov rifle) was inadmissibly late, and that MOB Hookah (previous owner) had disclosed the contested RCD in November 2013 within the Article 7(2) CDR grace period so there was no relevant prior art.
  • The Board found the combined evidence (photographs, travel documents, passport stamps, affidavits) proved D2 was exhibited at the TPC in January 2014; rejected the design holder's grace-period claim as unproven; found D2 and the RCD not identical (novelty survived) but producing the same overall impression on the informed user (AK-47 rifle stem shape dominant), so individual character was lacking.
  • The appeal was upheld; the RCD declared invalid under Article 6 CDR; the design holder ordered to bear all costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurM. Bra
  • MemberG. Humphreys
  • RegistrarM. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2504/2022-32023-06-28Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R2030/2022-32023-06-07Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R2416/2018-32023-03-01Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R2417/2018-32023-03-01Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R2415/2018-32023-03-01Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R2443/2020-32023-01-17Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R0068/2022-32023-01-09Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5
R0092/2022-32022-10-25Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b)5