DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001431829-0010

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-01-07

R1003/2018-3

Contested design: 001431829-0010

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Other

The appeal proceedings are suspended pending the final judgment of the General Court in Case T-574/19.

Show verbatim operative text

Suspends the appeal proceedings R 1003/2018-3, until the judgement in Case T-574/19 becomes final.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MYSTIC PRODUCTS IMPORT & EXPORT, SLvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Carrer Guifre Nº 689, 08918 Badalona, Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Tinnus Enterprises, LLCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

3429 18th Street, Plano Texas, United States (of America)

Represented by

Dentons Boekel N.V.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 8(1)Article 108

Argument summary

  • The design holder (Tinnus) appealed the Invalidity Division's declaration of invalidity of RCD No 1 431 829-0010 (fluid distribution equipment) on the ground that its features are solely dictated by technical function under Article 8(1) CDR.
  • The invalidity applicant (Mystic Products) requested that the appeal be dismissed.
  • The Board noted that the General Court received an appeal in Case T-574/19 challenging the Board's earlier decision (R 1002/2018-3) declaring a related RCD (No 1 431 829-0001) invalid on the same Article 8(1) CDR grounds, involving the same product and same parties.
  • The Board suspended the present appeal under Article 108 CDR read with Article 71(1)(a) EUTMDR, pending the final judgment in T-574/19 which will directly affect the outcome.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurG. Humphreys
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarR. Vidal

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1007/2018-32020-01-07Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1004/2018-32020-01-07Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1011/2018-32020-01-07Case suspendedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4