DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004378917-0018

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-02-11

R0554/2019-3

Contested design: 004378917-0018

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed; the design holder shall reimburse EUR 500 to the invalidity applicant.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. Il ricorso è respinto; 2. La titolare rifonderà la somma di 500 EUR alla richiedente la nullità.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €500

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SAVERGLASSvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Rue de la Gare, 3, 60960 Feuquieres, France

Represented by

Novagraaf France

Holder · RCD owner

Bruni Glass S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Viale C. Colombo, 12/14, 20090 Trezzano S/N Naviglio, Italy

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Bottle (gallone/jug type with handle)

RCD No 3 477 322-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-11-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • Design holder (Bruni Glass) appealed the Invalidity Division's declaration of invalidity of bottle RCD No 4 378 917-0018, arguing its bottle had a 'rounded and voluminous' shape clearly differing in neck taper direction, shoulder width, body taper, base, and handle from the prior RCD No 3 477 322-0001 which appeared 'cylindrical and linear'.
  • Invalidity applicant (SAVERGLASS) contended the designs share the same proportions, handle position, rounded handle shape, and 'linear and conical' body, producing the same overall impression; the designer's freedom would have permitted a genuinely different design.
  • The Board found both bottles share a circular body with inverted taper, rounded shoulders, short cylindrical neck, and a handle joining neck and shoulder; designer's freedom is very wide; differences in neck direction, shoulder curvature, body taper degree, base and handle are individually minor and do not collectively alter the same overall impression of similarity (déjà vu).
  • The appeal was dismissed; the contested RCD lacks individual character; design holder ordered to pay EUR 500 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurC. Rusconi
  • MemberM. Bra
  • RegistrarM. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗