← Back to search
Restitutio in integrum · 2020-05-12
R2243/2019-3
Contested design: 002308932-0002
CDRRCD lapsed at decision
Outcome
Restitutio refused
The appeal is dismissed.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen.
CostsNot specified
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
DMG MORI SEIKI CO., LTD.via PDF extraction
Japan (JP)
106, Kitakoriyama-cho, Yamatokoriyama-shi, Nara 639-1160, Japan
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
No opposing holder — Restitutio in integrum.
Legal grounds invoked
Art 13(3)Art 67(1)
From EUIPO API metadata.
Argument summary
- ›DMG MORI SEIKI CO., LTD. and DMG MORI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (joint applicants/holders) appealed the rejection of their restitutio in integrum request for reinstatement into the time-limit for renewing RCD registration No 2 308 932 (36 computer icons); they argued their representative's PatOrg software system operated correctly and that a single inexplicable isolated error in an otherwise well-functioning firm cannot constitute a lack of due care.
- ›The Office (Operations Department) found that the missed renewal was caused by the representative's own error in controlling and cross-checking whether renewal tasks had been completed, attributable to an insufficient internal control mechanism.
- ›The Board confirmed that restitutio requires all due care in the circumstances; human administrative errors are not extraordinary or unforeseeable; the representative was unable to identify why the error occurred, revealing an absence of a second verification step capable of catching such errors.
- ›The appeal is dismissed; the applicants and their representative failed to meet the strict due-care standard under Article 67(1) CDR and the restitutio request was rightly refused.
Deciding panel
- ChairTh. M. Margellos
- RapporteurA. Szanyi Felkl
- MemberE. Fink
- RegistrarH. Dijkema
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |
| R2243/2019-3 | 2020-05-12 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(1), Art 13(3) | — | 7 |