DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000733282-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-07-27

R1936/2019-3

Contested design: 000733282-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The Board takes note of the withdrawal of the invalidity application, declares both the invalidity and appeal proceedings closed, and takes note of the parties' agreement on costs (each party bears its own costs).

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note of the withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity; 2. Declares the invalidity and appeal proceedings closed; 3. Takes note of the agreement on costs between the parties.

CostsEach party bears its own costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

GIFI DIFFUSIONvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Zone Industrielle de la Barbière, BP 79, 47301 Villeneuve-sur-Lot, France

Represented by

Claire de CHASSEY

Holder · RCD owner

CROCS, INC.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, United States of America

Represented by

Fieldfisher Ireland

Legal grounds invoked

Art 12(2)

From EUIPO API metadata.

Argument summary

  • Invalidity applicant challenged RCD No 733 282-0001 (footwear/Crocs-style shoe) for lack of individual character; proceedings had a long procedural history including a prior Board decision annulled by the General Court and a remittal.
  • Design holder requested dismissal of the appeal in observations filed January 2020.
  • On 12 June 2020 the invalidity applicant informed the Registry it wished to withdraw the invalidity application; on 9 July 2020 the holder confirmed an amicable settlement under which each party bears its own costs.
  • The Board closed both invalidity and appeal proceedings as a consequence of the withdrawal; no substantive merits decision was made.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberC. Negro
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1762/2018-32020-03-16Decision confirmedArt 12(2)4
R0182/2018-32018-08-27Decision confirmedArt 12(2)2