DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001753104-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-08-24

R0658/2020-3

Contested design: 001753104-0002

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal inadmissible

The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible; each party bears its own costs in the appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal as inadmissible; 2. Orders that each party bear its own costs in the appeal procedure.

CostsEach party bears its own costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

OLVI OYJvia PDF extraction

Finland (FI)

PL 16, 74101 Iisalmi, Finland

Represented by

HEINONEN & CO

Holder · RCD owner

Oy Hartwall Abvia PDF extraction

Finland (FI)

Hiomotie 32, 00380 Helsinki, Finland

Represented by

BERGGREN OY

Legal grounds invoked

Article 57Article 35(1)Article 70(4)

Argument summary

  • The design holder appealed the Invalidity Division's decision invalidating the bottle design.
  • No statement of grounds of appeal was filed within the four-month time limit under Article 57 CDR, despite the Registry's reminder and later warning that the appeal was likely to be inadmissible.
  • The design holder did not respond to the inadmissibility communication, and the Board held that the appeal failed to comply with Article 57 CDR.
  • The appeal was dismissed as inadmissible; because the invalidity applicant had undertaken no procedural activity on appeal, each party was ordered to bear its own appeal costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurM. Bra
  • MemberC. Negro
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1172/2022-32022-12-02Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R1171/2022-32022-11-30Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R2022/2021-32022-06-21Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R0302/2019-32019-11-18Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R2200/2018-32019-10-15Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R2198/2018-32019-10-15Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R2199/2018-32019-10-15Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R1926/2018-32018-12-10Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5