DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002256354-0007

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-12-07

R0068/2019-3

Contested design: 002256354-0007

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The contested decision is set aside, the invalidity application is rejected, and the invalidity applicant must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben. Der Nichtigkeitsantrag wird zurückgewiesen. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningbo Degson Electronics Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 1585 Xiaolin Road, Cixi, Ningbo, Zhejiang 15321, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

KLAKA Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hansastr. 27, 32423 Minden, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

electrical connector / printed-circuit-board terminal block

RCD No 1733239-0003 · Community Designs Register certificate

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)Article 8(1)Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The design holder appealed the invalidation of its electrical-connector RCD and argued that the prior design D1 did not create the same overall impression, especially regarding the actuation feature and housing shape.
  • The invalidity applicant maintained that the connector was invisible in normal use, technically dictated, and lacked individual character over D1.
  • The Board found that the informed user would notice the clear difference between the contested design's actuation openings and D1's actuation pushers, and that those visible differences still mattered in the overall impression.
  • Because D1 did not destroy individual character, the appeal succeeded, the contested decision was annulled, and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2163/2022-32024-03-05Decision annulledArt 8(1), Art 4(2)7
R0069/2019-32020-12-07Decision annulledArt 8(1), Art 4(2)7
R0878/2022-32023-02-16Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 4(2)6
R1654/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 4(2)6
R1699/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 4(2)6
R1693/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 4(2)6
R1696/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 4(2)6
R1694/2021-32022-08-25Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 4(2)6