DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001033450-0004

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-01-19

R1498/2020-3

Contested design: 001033450-0004

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The Board takes note of the withdrawal of the invalidity application, closes the invalidity and appeal proceedings, sets aside the contested decision, and notes the parties’ agreement on costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note of the withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity; 2. Declares the invalidity and appeal proceedings closed; 3. Sets aside the contested decision; 4. Takes note of the agreement on costs.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ACCUMA S.P.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Eustachi, 46, 20129 Milano, Italy

Represented by

Giulio Enrico Sironi

Holder · RCD owner

ACCUMALUX S.A.via PDF extraction

LU

Allée de la Poudrerie, L-1899 Kockelscheuer, Luxembourg

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 5Article 6Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • ACCUMA sought invalidity of the contested battery design for lack of novelty, lack of individual character, technical-function features, and failure to satisfy Article 4(2) CDR.
  • The Invalidity Division declared the RCD invalid and ordered the design holder to bear costs; ACCUMALUX appealed seeking annulment of that decision.
  • During the appeal, ACCUMA withdrew the invalidity application and both parties informed the Board that they had settled the dispute and agreed on costs.
  • The Board found the proceedings had lost their purpose, closed both invalidity and appeal proceedings, set aside the contested decision, and made no costs order.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurC. Negro
  • MemberM. Bra
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1962/2020-32022-07-11Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R1957/2020-32022-07-11Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R1958/2020-32022-07-11Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R1960/2020-32022-07-11Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R1959/2020-32022-07-11Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R0968/2020-32021-02-02Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R1501/2020-32021-01-19Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5
R1496/2020-32021-01-19Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)5