DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002046367-0003

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-05-07

R0289/2013-3

Contested design: 002046367-0003

CDRAppellant: applicantRCD lapsed at decision

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The invalidity and appeal proceedings are closed because the contested Community design was surrendered, and each party bears its own costs.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Das Nichtigkeits- und das Beschwerdeverfahren werden aufgrund des Verzichts auf das Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 2046367-0003 eingestellt; 2. Jede Partei trägt die ihr im Nichtigkeits- und Beschwerdeverfahren entstandenen Kosten selbst.

CostsEach party bears its own costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tomasz Lisvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Kasztanowa 2 B, 05-510 Konstancin Jeziorna, Poland

Represented by

Kochanski & Partners

Karolina Marciniszyn

Holder · RCD owner

Agencja Wydawniczo-Reklamowa Wprost Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Domaniewska 39a, 02-672 Warszawa, Poland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant appealed the rejection of his invalidity application against the contested logo design, relying on lack of novelty, lack of individual character, and unauthorised use of his copyrighted logo.
  • The design holder requested dismissal of the appeal and the parties later obtained repeated suspensions pending related Polish court litigation.
  • Before any merits ruling, the holder surrendered the contested RCD and informed the Board that the surrender reflected an amicable settlement under which each side would bear its own costs.
  • The Board closed the invalidity and appeal proceedings and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0290/2013-32021-06-15Without deciding on the meritsArt 51(1)5
R0288/2013-32021-05-25Without deciding on the meritsArt 51(1)5
R0287/2013-32021-05-07Without deciding on the meritsArt 51(1)5
R0439/2019-32019-07-08Without deciding on the meritsArt 51(1)5
R1413/2012-32018-10-29Closed without decisionArt 51(1)4
R1418/2012-32018-10-29Closed without decisionArt 51(1)4
R1410/2012-32018-10-29Closed without decisionArt 51(1)4
R1415/2012-32018-10-29Closed without decisionArt 51(1)4