DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005622008-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-09-06

R2202/2020-3

Contested design: 005622008-0001

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the design holder must bear the invalidity applicant's costs and fees in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. Orders the design holder to bear the costs and fees incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Isik Tarim Ürünleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketivia PDF extraction

Türkiye (TR)

75. Yil Cumhuriyet Mahallesi Ova Sokak No:9 Ören, Kemalpasa Izmir 35733, Turkey

Represented by

Silex IP

Holder · RCD owner

Sda Gida Tarim Üretim Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketivia PDF extraction

Türkiye (TR)

Organize Sanayi Bölgesi 1299. Cad. No: 5, Turgutlu / Manisa, Turkey

Represented by

Carlos Hernández Hernández

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

food packaging container with lid shown on SEK website

https://www.sek.com.tr/ (Internet Archive capture 2017-09-23) · sek.com.tr via web.archive.org · disclosed 2017-09-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the contested food-packaging design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier food containers disclosed on the Turkish SEK website before the filing date.
  • The design holder argued that specialists in the EU would not be aware of the Turkish disclosure and that differences in the proportions and lid configuration produced a different overall impression.
  • The Board accepted the internet-archive evidence of disclosure and found that the dominant features of the compared designs were the same: the overall container shape and the lid shape, with the remaining differences too minor to alter the overall impression.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the first-instance invalidation for lack of individual character stood.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurS. Rizzo
  • MemberA. Szanyi Felkl
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗