← Back to search
Restitutio in integrum · 2021-10-28
R1251/2021-3
Contested design: 002718403-0001
RCD lapsed at decision
Outcome
Discontinued / withdrawn
The Board takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal and closes the appeal proceedings.
Show verbatim operative text
Takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal and closes the appeal proceedings.
CostsNot specified
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Hailey Hillvia PDF extraction
AU
21 Hirschfeld Crescent, Macgregor, Australia
Holder · RCD owner
No opposing holder — Restitutio in integrum.
Legal grounds invoked
Article 67(1)Article 13(3)
Argument summary
- ›After the Community design expired for non-renewal, the design holder filed a request for restitutio in integrum seeking reinstatement into the additional renewal period and paid the relevant fees.
- ›The Operations Department rejected the restitutio request and ordered reimbursement of the renewal and surcharge fees, after which the design holder appealed.
- ›The Registry later informed the design holder that the appeal was likely inadmissible because no statement of grounds had been filed, and the design holder then withdrew the appeal.
- ›The Board closed the appeal proceedings and the rejection of restitutio became final.
Deciding panel
- ChairG. Humphreys
- MemberH. Salmi
- MemberE. Fink
- RegistrarR. Vidal
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |