DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002745554-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-11-30

R0837/2020-3

Contested design: 002745554-0002

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The contested decision is annulled, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the design holder is ordered to bear the invalidity applicant’s costs in both instances.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision; 2. Declares registered Community design No 2 745 554-0002 invalid; 3. Orders the design holder to bear the costs and fees incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ALBATROS International GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Konrad-Zuse-Str. 3, 54552 Nerdlen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Homy Casa Limitedvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Second Booth Of No. 81, He'an Street, Xi'hua Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

chair

Amazon ASIN B075WD7D4N · amazon.de · disclosed 2012-10-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6Article 5

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant relied mainly on an earlier chair design shown on amazon.de and argued that the contested chair lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder challenged the disclosure evidence and argued that differences in the back, the side view and the coloured edging band distinguished the contested chair from the prior designs.
  • The Board held that prior design D1 had been validly disclosed on amazon.de and should also have been examined for individual character; the colourful edging and colour differences were only minor variations of the same L-shaped chair structure.
  • The prior design destroyed the individual character of the contested RCD, so the decision was annulled and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarR. Vidal

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0422/2023-32024-03-19Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2), Art 60(1)7
R0353/2022-32023-03-10Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2), Art 60(1)7
R1546/2018-32019-01-22Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 60(1)7
R0116/2025-32025-07-14Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2)6
R0115/2025-32025-07-14Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2)6
R1669/2023-32024-11-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2)6
R2427/2023-32024-07-31Decision partially annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2), Art 60(1)6
R2336/2022-32023-11-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 63(2)6