DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003773068-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-02-01

R0221/2021-3

Contested design: 003773068-0001

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed and the design holder must bear the invalidity applicant's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. Orders the design holder to bear the costs incurred by the invalidity applicant.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

REFAN BULGARIA EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Karlovsko shose, 52, Trud, Bulgaria

Represented by

IP CONSULTING LTD.

Holder · RCD owner

FIONNA COSMETICS EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

7, Bulgaria Blvd., fl.7, app.7, 1408 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Vasil Pavlov Pavlov

Prior art cited (2)

Trade markTM1

three-dimensional flower-blossom shaped soap/candle mark

Bulgarian trade mark No 78 008 · Bulgarian Patent Office Official Bulletin / database extract · disclosed 2011-06-30

Trade markTM2

three-dimensional flower-blossom shaped soap/candle mark

Bulgarian trade mark No 86 121 · Bulgarian Patent Office Official Bulletin No 05/2013 · disclosed 2013-05-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • The design holder argued that its rose-shaped soap or candle differed significantly from the earlier Bulgarian three-dimensional marks, that flower-blossom shapes were common in the sector, and that the trade-mark ground under Article 25(1)(e) CDR was inadequately supported.
  • The invalidity applicant maintained that the contested design produced the same overall impression as its earlier Bulgarian flower-blossom mark registrations and also relied on those marks as earlier rights under Bulgarian law.
  • The Board found TM2 validly disclosed before filing, treated it as relevant prior design material, and held that both shapes conveyed the same overall impression of a circular flower blossom despite minor petal-spacing differences and the broad designer freedom for soaps and candles.
  • The appeal was dismissed; the contested RCD lacked individual character and the design holder had to bear the invalidity applicant's costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗