DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007737143-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-03-29

R1697/2021-3

Contested design: 007737143-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The contested decision is set aside, the registered Community design is declared invalid, and the design holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 7 737 143-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die GGM-Inhaberin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Musto Et Bureau Srlvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Molise, 26/28, 40024 Osteria Grande (BO), Italien

Represented by

Francesco de Sanzuane

Holder · RCD owner

Rauch Furnace Technology GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Fichtenweg 3, 4810 Gmunden, Österreich

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

crucible

Mod. 250 · Technical drawing, catalog, invoices and supporting declaration · disclosed 2010-04-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant relied mainly on the earlier crucible model “Mod. 250”, supported by a technical drawing, catalog material, invoices, and further evidence on appeal.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and denied that the compared crucible designs produced the same overall impression or that the applicant had established any invalidity ground.
  • The Board admitted the supplementary evidence, found disclosure of Mod. 250 proven, assessed designer freedom as average, and held that the compared crucible designs created no different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The appeal succeeded; the first-instance rejection was set aside and the contested RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurA. Pohlmann
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R1719/2023-32024-06-21Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R1747/2022-32024-01-29Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R0367/2022-32023-06-26Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R0082/2023-32023-06-16Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R0081/2023-32023-06-15Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4
R2025/2021-32022-07-20Decision confirmedArt 6(1)4