← Back to search
Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-11-24
R0390/2022-3
Contested design: 006581427-0002
Appellant: applicant
Outcome
Appeal inadmissible
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
Die Beschwerde wird als unzulässig zurückgewiesen.
CostsNo costs order
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
MOE'S Shisha GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Bleckeder Landstraße 37, 21337 Lüneburg, Deutschland
Holder · RCD owner
No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.
Legal grounds invoked
Article 50(4)Article 57Article 35(1)
Argument summary
- ›The applicant appealed the Office finding that the deferred designs were to be treated as never having had effect because no timely publication request was filed.
- ›The Board reminded the applicant to file grounds of appeal within four months, but no statement of grounds was submitted.
- ›Because the appeal lacked a statement of grounds, it did not satisfy Article 57 CDR and had to be rejected under Article 35 CDIR.
- ›The appeal was rejected as inadmissible.
Deciding panel
- ChairG. Humphreys
- RapporteurA. Pohlmann
- MemberC. Bartos
- RegistrarH. Dijkema
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |