DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008615942-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2023-05-11

R0309/2023-3

Contested design: 008615942-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The Board takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal and the invalidity request, closes both proceedings, and takes note of the parties' agreement on costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal and the request for a declaration of invalidity and declares the invalidity and the appeal proceedings closed; 2. Takes note of the agreement on costs concluded by the parties.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Exani Sports ABvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Skaraborgsgatan 49, SE-53230 Skara, Sweden

Represented by

Zacco Sweden AB

Holder · RCD owner

Theorema Scandinavia ABvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Vastergatan 3, SE-289 46 Glimakra, Sweden

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 70(5)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant had sought invalidation of the contested shoes design for lack of novelty and individual character under Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Articles 4(1), 5(1) and 6(1) CDR.
  • The Invalidity Division rejected the invalidity application and ordered the invalidity applicant to bear the costs, after which the invalidity applicant appealed.
  • During the appeal, the parties informed the Office that they had reached an amicable settlement, withdrew both the appeal and the invalidity request, and agreed that no decision on costs was required.
  • The Board closed the invalidity and appeal proceedings as devoid of purpose and merely took note of the parties' costs agreement.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurA. Pohlmann
  • MemberS. Rizzo
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0311/2023-32023-05-11OtherArt 70(5)5
R1936/2024-32025-10-09Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)4
R1937/2024-32025-10-09Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)4
R1348/2024-32024-11-05Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)4
R0155/2022-32023-07-28Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)4
R0411/2023-32023-05-17Closed without decisionArt 70(5)4
R0410/2023-32023-05-17Closed without decisionArt 70(5)4
R1962/2020-32022-07-11Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(5)4