DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008147201-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2023-06-30

R0856/2022-3

Contested design: 008147201-0001

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed and the design holder must bear the invalidity applicant's costs in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. Il ricorso è respinto; 2. Le spese sostenute dalla richiedente nei procedimenti di nullità e di ricorso sono poste a carico della titolare.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

AUDI AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Auto-Union-Str. 1, 85057 Ingolstadt, Germania

Represented by

AWA Norway AS

Holder · RCD owner

G.M.P. Group s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Luigi Galvani 8-12, 24061 Albano Sant'Alessandro (BG), Italia

Represented by

Giulio Bonadio

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

wheel rims for vehicles

RCD No 6 645 644-003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-09-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant sought invalidity of the wheel-rim RCD for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 6 645 644-003.
  • The design holder argued the earlier design was itself invalid, the sector was crowded and constrained, and the two rims still differed sufficiently for the informed user.
  • The Board held publication of the earlier RCD was sufficient disclosure and that crowding and alleged invalidity of the earlier design did not prevent reliance on it.
  • Comparing the contested design with the earlier rim, the Board found the common features dominated and the contested RCD lacked individual character, so the appeal was dismissed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurC. Negro
  • MemberS. Rizzo
  • RegistrarR. Vidal Romero

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2322/2024-32025-05-21Decision confirmedArt 6(1)(b), Art 5(2), Art 5(1)(b), Art 7(1)9
R0054/2025-32025-09-18Decision confirmedArt 7(1), Art 5(2), Art 5(1)(b)7
R2422/2022-32024-01-30Decision confirmedArt 7(1), Art 6(1)(b)7
R0055/2022-32022-10-07Decision confirmedArt 7(1), Art 6(1)(b)7
R0303/2021-32022-07-12Decision confirmedArt 7(1), Art 6(1)(b)7
R1577/2016-32018-06-01Decision confirmedArt 7(1), Art 6(1)(b)7
R1434/2020-32021-06-25Decision annulledArt 7(1), Art 6(1)(b)6
R0931/2018-32019-07-25Decision annulledArt 7(1), Art 5(1)(b)6