Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2023-09-26
R0532/2023-3
Contested design: 004352300-0014
Outcome
The appeal is dismissed, and the invalidity applicant shall bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Nichtigkeitsantragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und Beschwerdeverfahrens.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L. Picdavia PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Crta. Nacional 340, S/N, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Papier-Mettler KGvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland
Prior art cited (3)
blue IKEA bag with three blue handles and yellow IKEA print
https://thesmalls.com/article/the-blue-bag-film-honours-ikeas-frakta-like-the-icon-it-is · The Smalls · disclosed 2017-07-05
shopping bag with basket print, dark-green side panels and dark-green double handles
https://twitter.com/superpilopi/status/719595431219634180?lang=es · Twitter / Superpilopi · disclosed 2016-04-11
light shopping bag with basket print and dark-green double handles
http://noticiascarlosg.blogspot.com/2012/03/bolsas-de-membrillo.html · Carlos Garrido blog · disclosed 2012-03-15
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The invalidity applicant argued that the contested upper bag section with double handles lacked novelty and individual character over earlier online bag disclosures.
- ›The holder maintained that the cited earlier bags differed materially in handle number, proportions, colours, prints and seam configuration.
- ›The Board accepted disclosure for D7 to D9 and assessed the designs from the standpoint of an informed user familiar with shopping bags and bag parts.
- ›Because D7 to D9 produced a different overall impression from the contested design, the appeal was dismissed.
Deciding panel
- ChairG. Humphreys
- RapporteurA. Pohlmann
- MemberE. Fink
- RegistrarH. Dijkema
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0116/2025-3 | 2025-07-14 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R0115/2025-3 | 2025-07-14 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R1669/2023-3 | 2024-11-18 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R2453/2023-3 | 2024-10-30 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R0952/2021-3 | 2024-09-16 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R2140/2023-3 | 2024-08-14 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R2585/2023-3 | 2024-08-06 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |
| R1745/2023-3 | 2024-06-25 | Decision confirmed | Art 25(1)(b) | — | 5 |