← Back to search
Restitutio in integrum · 2023-12-08
R0630/2023-3
Contested design: 003330828-0010
CDRRCD lapsed at decision
Outcome
Restitutio refused
The appeal is dismissed.
Show verbatim operative text(it)
Respinge il ricorso.
CostsNot specified
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Stefano Ricci S.p.A.via PDF extraction
Italy (IT)
Via Faentina, 171, 50010 Fiesole (FI), Italia
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
No opposing holder — Restitutio in integrum.
Legal grounds invoked
Article 67(1)Article 67(2)Article 67(3)Article 13(3)
Argument summary
- ›The design holder sought restitutio in integrum after missing the renewal deadline for RCD Nos 3 330 828-0001 to 3 330 828-0013, arguing that its representative had an otherwise reliable deadline-monitoring system and that an exceptional family-health event prevented timely renewal instructions.
- ›There was no opposing private party; this was an ex parte appeal against the Operations Department's refusal of restitutio in integrum.
- ›The Board held that the holder and its representative had not shown all due care: the responsible employee already knew the renewal deadlines, continued working remotely, yet no adequate backup plan or effective internal mail-control system was in place during his absence.
- ›The Board concluded that the due-care standard under Article 67 CDR was not met, so the appeal was dismissed and restitutio remained refused.
Deciding panel
- ChairS. Stürmann
- RapporteurS. Rizzo
- MemberC. Negro
- Registrarp.o. E. Wagner
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| itItalian | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |
| R0630/2023-3 | 2023-12-08 | Decision confirmed | Art 67(2), Art 67(1), Art 67(3), Art 63(2) | — | 11 |