DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001284608-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-09-09

R0030/2018-3

Contested design: 001284608-0002

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, the invalidity applicant must bear the design holder's costs in the invalidity and appeal proceedings, and those costs are fixed at EUR 900.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal. 2. Orders the invalidity applicant to bear the costs and fees incurred by the design holder in the invalidity and appeal proceedings. 3. Fixes the costs to be paid by the invalidity applicant to the design holder for the invalidity and appeal proceedings at EUR 900.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €900

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Delta Sport Handelskontor GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Wragekamp 6, 22397 Hamburg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Lego A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Aastvej 1, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

BOMHARD IP, S.L.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that all visible features of the toy building block were solely dictated by technical function under Article 8(1) CDR and that Article 8(3) did not apply.
  • The design holder argued the design was not exclusively functional, formed part of a modular toy system protected by Article 8(3) CDR, and the late prior-art submissions were inadmissible.
  • The Board found all seven identified features were function-driven and also features of interconnection under Article 8(2) CDR.
  • The Board nevertheless held the design qualified for the Article 8(3) modular-systems exception and that the applicant had not properly established earlier disclosures defeating novelty or individual character.
  • The appeal was dismissed, the invalidity application rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 900 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberC. Negro
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0204/2024-32025-06-04Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 8(2)7
R0029/2018-32024-09-09Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 8(2)7
R1524/2021-32022-05-30Decision confirmedArt 8(1), Art 8(2)7
R0420/2023-32024-09-02Decision annulledArt 8(1), Art 8(2)6
R1394/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 8(1)5
R1395/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 8(1)5
R1826/2025-32026-04-22Decision confirmedArt 8(1)5
R0947/2025-32026-04-07Decision confirmedArt 8(1)5