DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009086846-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-09-09

R2550/2023-3

Contested design: 009086846-0001

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the design holder must bear the invalidity applicant's costs and fees in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal. 2. Orders the design holder to bear the costs and fees incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

IKOONA SP. Z O.O.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Marsz. Józefa Piłsudskiego 74/230, 50020 WROCŁAW, Poland

Represented by

Aleksandra Kacperska

Holder · RCD owner

Tomasz Gotszlikvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Glinki 27a, 63-200 Jarocin, Poland

Represented by

Kondrat & Partners

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

multicoloured wafer ice cream cornet marketed by Soforek sp. z o.o.

Facebook / Soforek sp. z o.o. · disclosed 2019-10-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The design holder argued that production constraints limited design freedom, the market was saturated with similar multicoloured cones, and differences in stripe count, colours and orientation created a different overall impression.
  • The invalidity applicant replied that the cone's decoration was unconstrained, saturation was unproven, and the contested RCD duplicated the prior design's key pattern of multicoloured horizontal segments.
  • The Board accepted the supplemental appeal evidence but found no proven technical constraints beyond basic cone form and size, leaving a high degree of design freedom for decoration.
  • The Board held that the prior design was disclosed before filing and that the conflicting designs produced the same overall impression, so the invalidity decision was confirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2274/2025-32026-05-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0093/2025-32026-05-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R2273/2025-32026-05-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1575/2025-32026-04-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1395/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1394/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1318/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1396/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5