DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002175802-0003

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-09-26

R1885/2023-3

Contested design: 002175802-0003

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The contested decision is set aside, the case is remitted to the Invalidity Division for further examination, and each party bears its own costs of the appeal.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben. 2. Die Angelegenheit wird zur weiteren Bearbeitung an die Nichtigkeitsabteilung zurückverwiesen. 3. Die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens trägt jede Partei selbst.

CostsEach party bears its own costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LTV Leuchten & Lampen Vertriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.via PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Industriestraße B Nr. 4, 2345 Brunn am Gebirge, Österreich

Holder · RCD owner

XAL GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Auer-Welsbach-Gasse 36, 8055 Graz, Österreich

Prior art cited (15)

Web disclosureAnlage D

Screenshot with the indication "Große Art Deco Bauhaus Hexagon Deckenleuchte Lampe aus den 30er Jahren"

deerbe.com · deerbe.com

Web disclosureAnlage E

Screenshot with the indication "Sechseckige Tiffany-Glas-Deckenleuchte"

casalumi.de · casalumi.de

Web disclosureAnlage F

Screenshot with the indication "Raak Holland Sechseck Deckenleuchte Wandleuchte"

ebay.com · ebay.com

Web disclosureAnlage G

Screenshots with the indication "Deckenlampe von Erco, 1970er"

pamono.at · pamono.at

Web disclosureAnlage H

Screenshot with the indication "LED Deckenlampe"

amazon.de · amazon.de

Web disclosureAnlage J

Screenshot with the indication "Akustik-Spanndecke ACOUSTIC LIGHT®"

archiexpo.de · archiexpo.de

Web disclosureAnlage K

Screenshots with the indication "Deutsche sechseckige Volcano Wandlampe, 1970er"

pamono.at · pamono.at

Web disclosureAnlage L

Screenshots with the indication "Wandlampe von Albano Poli für Poliarte"

pamono.at · pamono.at

CatalogAnlage M

Catalog page for "HALO2 Hexagon"

UEBEX LED Lighting · UEBEX LED Lighting

PublicationAnlage W

Article with image(s) and a Wikipedia entry for "Forumsgebäude"

The Forum Building, a tailor-made lighting

National designAnlage Y(1)

Chinese design shown in Annex Y

CN design No. 201030163935.4 · China / DesignView · disclosed 2011-11-02

National designAnlage Y(2)

Chinese design shown in Annex Y

CN design No. 200730315437.5 · China / DesignView · disclosed 2008-10-29

National designAnlage Y(3)

Chinese design shown in Annex Y

CN design No. 201030668277.4 · China / DesignView · disclosed 2011-05-18

National designAnlage Y(4)

Chinese design shown in Annex Y

CN design No. 200930021325.8 · China / DesignView · disclosed 2010-07-28

Registered RCD

Earlier Community design named in the invalidity application form

RCD No. 2568766-0005 · EUIPO register · disclosed 2014-11-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The holder-appellant argued that the contested design had several distinctive structural features beyond a hexagonal shape and created a different overall impression from the cited Chinese design.
  • The invalidity applicant-respondent maintained that the identical hexagonal basic structure dominated the overall impression and that the Chinese design had been made available to the public under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • The Board considered disclosure of Chinese design No. 201030163935.4 in the applicant's favour but held that disclosure need not be finally resolved because the cited design did not produce the same overall impression.
  • The Board found substantial differences in the body, frame, mounting depth, and additional light elements, set aside the invalidity decision, and remitted the case for examination of the remaining prior art.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0577/2025-32026-01-21Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R0823/2024-32025-06-18Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R0010/2024-32024-10-02Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R2460/2022-32024-04-15Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R0422/2023-32024-03-19Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R0353/2022-32023-03-10Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R1866/2021-32022-09-16Decision annulledArt 60(1)5
R0029/2022-32025-04-16Remitted (further prosecution)Art 60(1)4