DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008517882-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-11-11

R1063/2023-3

Contested design: 008517882-0002

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Schneid Gesellschaft m.b.H.via PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Gewerbering 16, 8054 Pirka, Österreich

Represented by

Stefan Lausegger

Holder · RCD owner

aqotec Holding GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Vöcklatal 35, 4890 Weißenkirchen im Attergau, Österreich

Represented by

Clemens Thiele

Prior art cited (1)

Other

Earlier SCHNEID company logo / logo variants relied on by the invalidity applicant

Applicant website, advertising, building signage and trade fair materials · disclosed 2011-10-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 25(3)

Argument summary

  • The holder appealed, arguing procedural error, insufficient proof of disclosure of the earlier logo, and a different overall impression between the signs.
  • The invalidity applicant defended the decision, maintained both Article 25(1)(b) and 25(1)(e) grounds, and said Austrian law protected its SCHNEID company name.
  • The Board considered the late-filed materials and held that the applicant had proved an earlier distinctive company name protected under Austrian unfair competition law.
  • The Board found the contested design used the SCHNEID sign and created a likelihood of confusion, so invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) succeeded and the appeal failed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0055/2022-32022-10-07Decision confirmedArt 63(2), Art 60(1)7
R2427/2023-32024-07-31Decision partially annulledArt 63(2), Art 60(1)6
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 63(2)5
R1669/2023-32024-11-18Decision confirmedArt 63(2), Art 25(1)(e)5
R0912/2023-32023-12-15Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(e)5
R1017/2023-32023-12-15Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(e)5
R1016/2023-32023-12-14Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(e)5
R1448/2022-32023-05-18Decision confirmedArt 60(1)5