DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008465249-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2025-03-19

R1330/2022-3

Contested design: 008465249-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal partially upheld

The appeal is partially upheld: the refusal of the Article 25(1)(f) invalidity ground is annulled, the case is remitted to the Invalidity Division, and each party bears its own appeal costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Partially annuls the contested decision to the extent that it rejected the invalidity application based on Article 25(1)(f) CDR. 2. Remits the case to the Invalidity Division for further prosecution. 3. Orders each party to bear its own costs and fees incurred in the appeal proceedings.

CostsEach party bears its own costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Damian Peca Impaktvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Warzywna 18, 42-208 Częstochowa, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Zakład Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowy ‘FORMES TOYS’ mgr inż. Grzegorz Chudyvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Śląska 69, 42-130 Wręczyca Wielka, Poland

Represented by

Anna Korbela

Prior art cited (10)

National designD1

lantern

Polish design registration No 26 188 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2020-08-24

National designD2

lantern

Polish design registration No 26 188 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2020-08-24

National designD3

lantern

Polish design registration No 26 188 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2020-08-24

National designD4

lantern

Polish design registration No 26 188 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2020-08-24

National designD5

lantern

Polish design registration No 26 563 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2020-12-28

National designD6

lantern

Polish design application No 29 100 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2021-07-26

National designD7

lantern

Polish design application No 29 656 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2021-08-09

National designD8

lantern

Polish design application No 29 657 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2021-08-09

National designD9

lantern

Polish design application No 29 658 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2021-08-09

National designD10

lantern

Polish design application No 29 289 · Polish Patent Office / Official Patent Gazette · disclosed 2021-07-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(d)Article 10Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • Applicant appealed, arguing D1-D10 were properly disclosed or protected, the informed user would focus on the openwork feather body, and the contested design also copied a copyrighted lantern-feather arrangement.
  • Holder challenged the representative’s authority, denied disclosure and similarity, argued the market was crowded and the contested design differed, and said copyright or ownership issues belonged before national courts.
  • The Board admitted the appeal-stage evidence, confirmed D1-D5 were disclosed before filing but found the contested RCD still novel and individually distinctive; D6-D10 were only relevant under Article 25(1)(d) and caused no conflict.
  • The Board held the new copyright-law materials and court decision sufficiently substantiated Article 25(1)(f), partially annulled the rejection on that ground, remitted the case, and ordered each party to bear its own appeal costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys Bacon
  • RapporteurC. Negro
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0093/2025-32026-05-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R2274/2025-32026-05-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R2273/2025-32026-05-18Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R1575/2025-32026-04-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R1395/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R1392/2025-32026-04-28Remitted (further prosecution)Art 25(1)(b)4
R1396/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4
R1394/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)4