Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2026-05-28
R0338/2025-3
Contested design: 008031025-0003
Outcome
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The design holder is ordered to reimburse the costs incurred by the invalidity applicant in the appeal proceedings.
Show verbatim operative text(pl)
1. Oddalić odwołanie; 2. Nakazać właścicielowi wzoru zwrot kosztów poniesionych przez wnioskodawcę w postępowaniu odwoławczym.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
ANIA KRUK spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction
Poland (PL)
Poznań, Poland
Represented by
Krzysztof Westfal
Holder · RCD owner
Krzysztof Witczakvia PDF extraction
Poland (PL)
Jasin, Poland
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
butterfly/ornamental motif jewellery piece (bracelet charm), referenced as model AP129-7951 by holder
APART Lato 2018, page 88 · APART catalogue (Poland)
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Holder (appellant) argued the APART catalogue was admitted late, images were unclear and insufficient for comparison, and meaningful differences in the butterfly ornament design warranted individual character.
- ›Applicant (respondent) maintained the catalogue and online link were timely and clear, and both designs produce the same overall impression on the informed jewellery user.
- ›The Board confirmed prior disclosure via catalogue excerpt, found designer's freedom broad in decorative jewellery, and held that differences in the butterfly/ornamental motif were insufficiently pronounced to alter the overall impression.
- ›The appeal was dismissed; the holder bears the applicant's costs in the appeal proceedings.
Deciding panel
- ChairG. Humphreys Bacon
- MemberH. Salmi
- MemberC. Bartos
- RegistrarK. Zajfert
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| plPolish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |