DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002291112-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-05-30

000010672

Contested design: 002291112-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0022911120001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Raf-Stal sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Wegierska 78, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Weihong Hardware and Plastic Products Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

188 Industrial Park, Pingshan Village, Tangxia Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (4)

Patent

holder's 'Hinge regulator' patent showing the hinge adjuster appearance

EP 2803296 B1 / US 8661619 B2

Registered RCD

RCD No 002002956-0016

Registered RCD

RCD No 001969361-0002

Catalog

Several printouts and extracts of catalogues, including invoices, alleging prior disclosure of different prior designs

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested hinge design was entirely dictated by technical function and also lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier disclosures.
  • The holder replied that the design was not solely functional, that clients cared about its appearance, and that the applicant's prior-disclosure evidence and expert opinion were unpersuasive.
  • The Division found the design's essential features were chosen only to achieve the hinge's technical function, relying in particular on the holder's own EP 2803296 B1 patent.
  • The invalidity ground under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 8(1) CDR succeeded, so the RCD was declared invalid without examining the other pleaded grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088