DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003357235-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-22

000010680

Contested design: 003357235-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against RCD No 003357235-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003357235-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pont Packaging GmbH

Germany (DE)

Dohrweg 2a, 41066 Mönchengladbach, Germany

Represented by

Klaus Castell

Holder · RCD owner

Marba Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Racula – Głogowska 10A, 66-004, Zielona Góra, Poland

Represented by

Robert Rozbicki

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

Evaporator variations (a), (b) and (c) from the patent "Evaporator with a container and a wick protruding out of the container and a cap with channel for covering different wick lengths"

EP 2 357 011 B1 · European Patent Office patent database · disclosed 2012-08-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, alleging prior disclosure at the PLMA Amsterdam trade fair and relying on patent EP 2 357 011 B1 and related correspondence.
  • The holder declined to submit observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division rejected the email and letter printouts as insufficient proof of public disclosure, but accepted the patent publication as evidence of prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the patent designs with the contested RCD, the Division found multiple visible differences, held the designs were not identical, and rejected the application.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin van Bavel
  • MemberBirgit Filtenborg

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105504

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2019-07-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000105503

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2019-06-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000011128

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2019-05-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000103459

vs Guangzhou Milin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.

2019-03-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000010612

vs FIONNA COSMETICS EOOD

2018-12-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000010870

vs REFAN BULGARIA EOOD

2018-10-31Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000010869

vs REFAN BULGARIA EOOD

2018-10-31Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288
000010592

vs KUBI, spol. s.r.o.

2018-04-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)288