DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001974635-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-10

000011033

Contested design: 001974635-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 001974635-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

INO-ROPE

France (FR)

1 Rue des Senneurs, 29900 Concarneau, France

Holder · RCD owner

Ropeye OÜvia PDF extraction

EE

Tartu mnt 80j, 10112 Tallinn, Estonia

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

padeye with circular base and loop

FR 2 847 012 · French patent register · disclosed 2004-05-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the padeye was not visible in normal use, was solely technically dictated, and lacked novelty and individual character over French patent FR 2 847 012.
  • The holder filed no timely observations; its late observations and evidence were disregarded.
  • The Division found Articles 8(1) and 4(2) unproven, accepted disclosure of the French patent, but held that the contested design differed materially in its base, loop shape, decoration, and composition.
  • The RCD was held to be new and to have individual character, so the invalidity application was rejected with costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000011037

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2018-07-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)0810
000110882

vs GENERALE MAATSCHAPPIJ VOOR PLASTIEK INTERNATIONAAL NV

2021-06-29Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)089
000110881

vs GENERALE MAATSCHAPPIJ VOOR PLASTIEK INTERNATIONAAL NV

2021-06-29Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)089
000110883

vs GENERALE MAATSCHAPPIJ VOOR PLASTIEK INTERNATIONAAL NV

2021-06-29Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)089
000106559

vs COREgravel UK Ltd

2020-10-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011138

vs HYPERTHERM, INC.

2019-10-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010803

vs Firma Handlowa „tm" Tomasz Filipiak

2019-07-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010997

vs AGS Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088