DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002587188-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-28

000011016

Contested design: 002587188-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002587188-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dimitrula Paraskos

GR

Therisu 37 Street, Apmelokipi, Thessaloniki, Greece

Represented by

Elitsa Mitsova

Holder · RCD owner

ЛЪКИЛОКС АД

Bulgaria (BG)

Бул. Илиянци № 123, 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Kostadin Manev

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

YouTube review video of the “TURBO DECODER BAG HI66 2/3 gen.” lock pick / door opener showing the earlier design

YouTube · disclosed 2013-11-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested lock-pick design lacked novelty and individual character because the same design had been publicly marketed and shown online since 2011, outside the grace period.
  • The holder said the prior images were unproven internet allegations and pointed to differences in handle markings, etching depth, and protruding rods.
  • The Division accepted the dated YouTube review as solid proof of prior disclosure and found the key-cut differences technical and the grip-depth difference too slight to affect overall impression.
  • The novelty attack failed, but the design lacked individual character; the invalidity application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088