DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003421619-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-10-24

000010792

Contested design: 003421619-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 003421619-0001 is rejected, and the applicant is ordered to bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se deniega la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 003421619-0001. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Distribuciones Quesos Latinos S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

calle Princesa nº 49, 1º derecha, 28008 Madrid, España

Represented by

Judith Ibañez Alonso

Holder · RCD owner

Quesos Campo Latino S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

calle Gran Vía nº 78, 28013 Madrid, España

Represented by

Alvamark

Sonia Álvarez López

Prior art cited (6)

OtherD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Two earlier label images for cheese products

Web disclosureD4⚠ rejected as evidence

JR Quesos Latinos cheese label image

Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2012-02-16

Web disclosureD5⚠ rejected as evidence

JR Quesos Latinos cheese label image

Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2012-02-17

Web disclosureD6⚠ rejected as evidence

JR Quesos Latinos cheese label image

Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2012-02-17

Web disclosureD7⚠ rejected as evidence

JR Quesos Latinos cheese label image

Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2012-02-17

Web disclosureD8⚠ rejected as evidence

Image of a delivery van associated with the earlier labels

Facebook post · Facebook · disclosed 2014-05-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing that the contested cheese label copied earlier JR Quesos Latinos labels and related marketing materials.
  • The holder argued the applicant had no relevant earlier design rights, the court documents were not decisive, the label was new, and the cited common elements were banal within dairy-product labels.
  • The Division held that the undated label images, Facebook screenshots, court pleadings, and hearing recording did not provide concrete and objective proof that a specific earlier design had been publicly disclosed before filing.
  • Because prior disclosure under Article 7 was not established, the invalidity grounds under Articles 5 and 6 failed and the application was rejected with costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109361

vs Schwan-STABILO Schwanhäußer GmbH & Co. KG

2020-03-11Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010128

vs Sanford, L.P.

2018-10-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010126

vs Sanford, L.P.

2018-10-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010130

vs Sanford, L.P.

2018-10-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010127

vs Sanford, L.P.

2018-10-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010129

vs Sanford, L.P.

2018-10-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010793

vs QUESOS CAMPO LATINO, S.L.

2018-10-24Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198
000010578

vs Shanghai Lees Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

2018-06-22Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)198