Invalidity · first instance · 2018-10-29
000102279
Contested design: 002987396-0006
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNot specified
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Ningbo Klite Electric Manufacture Co., Ltd.
China (CN)
1702 East Air Building, 796 East Zhongshan Road, Ningbo, 315040, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Robin Wang
Holder · RCD owner
Liquidleds Lighting CORPvia PDF extraction
Taiwan (TW)
Suite A2, 9F., No. 333, Sec.2, Dunhua S. Rd., Da-an Distr., Taipei City 10669, Taiwan
Represented by
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity of Community design No 0029873960006 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR.
- ›No holder observations are recorded; the decision addresses only the application's formal admissibility.
- ›The Division found the applicant's employee representative had not filed the signed authorisation required by Article 77(3) CDR and gave no supporting explanation.
- ›After the applicant failed to cure the deficiency within the set deadline, the application was rejected as inadmissible and the fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
- MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000106699 vs Shenzhen Juku Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. | 2020-05-19 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000104419 vs Lukas Staffen | 2019-11-04 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000102399 vs INTAV S.R.L. | 2019-08-09 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000101440 vs KARE Design GmbH | 2019-07-09 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000104899 vs Daxtor ApS | 2019-05-22 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000103059 vs ZHEJIANG CHINA-BEST IMPORT & EXPORT CO.,LTD | 2019-05-20 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000102099 vs LIQUIDLEDS LIGHTING CORP | 2019-03-08 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000011221 vs HANGZHOU CHENGYUE ELECTRON& ELECTRIC CO.., LTD. | 2019-02-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |