DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004045631-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-11-06

000011046

Contested design: 004045631-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 004045631-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

The House of Art GmbH

Germany (DE)

Dingdener Straße 199, 46395 Bocholt, Germany

Represented by

André Nienhaus

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Nuoyuekeer Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Longhua Street, Longhua New District, Shenzhen (Guangdong) 362300, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (3)

National design

opener get-up or trade dress with advertising panel

German design registration No 402016101000-0009 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office design database · disclosed 2017-01-05

National design

opener get-up or trade dress with advertising panel

German design registration No 402016101000-0010 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office design database · disclosed 2017-01-05

National design

opener get-up or trade dress with advertising panel

German design registration No 402016101000-0011 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office design database · disclosed 2017-01-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(d) CDR, arguing the contested bottle-opener design was identical to three earlier German national design registrations.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the earlier rights existed but found Article 25(1)(d) was not met because those designs had been published before, not after, the contested RCD filing date.
  • The earlier registered designs also created a different overall impression because they covered an opener with an advertising panel rather than the opener alone.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000107941

vs Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V.

2020-09-30Art 25(1)(d)077
000107944

vs Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V.

2020-09-30Art 25(1)(d)077
000107943

vs Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V.

2020-09-30Art 25(1)(d)077
000107960

vs Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V.

2020-09-30Art 25(1)(d)077
000107959

vs Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V.

2020-09-30Art 25(1)(d)077
000107942

vs Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V.

2020-09-30Art 25(1)(d)077
000108801

vs BERLIN PACKAGING FRANCE

2020-10-23Invalidity application rejected076
000105464

vs SNV Creations Inc.

2019-12-23Invalidity application rejected076