DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000690482-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-02-12

000010660

Contested design: 000690482-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 000690482-0003 is rejected; the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 000690482-0003 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Micromic S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Via Silvio Pellico 19/9ª, 00040 Pomezia RM, Italien

Represented by

R&P Legal

Holder · RCD owner

Vorwerk & Co. Interholding GmbH

Germany (DE)

Mühlenweg 17-37, 42275 Wuppertal, Deutschland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued the brush replacement plate was an invisible component of a complex product during normal use and was therefore excluded under Article 4(2) CDR.
  • It also argued the plate's essential features were dictated solely by technical function or by necessary interconnection requirements under Article 8(1) and 8(2) CDR.
  • The holder replied that the plate remained at least partly visible in normal use and that its shape, proportions, hooks, opening, grooves, and brush layout reflected design choice, not only technical necessity.
  • The Invalidity Division found the applicant had not proved non-visibility during intended use or that the contested features were exclusively functional or had to be reproduced in exact form and dimensions.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010661

vs Vorwerk Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG

2019-02-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)158
000010887

vs Indexator Rotator Systems AB

2018-09-24Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)158
000124955

vs Terence A.H.F. Noppe h.o.d.n. EasySwift

2025-09-05Art 25(1)(b)157
000122714

vs LEIFHEIT AG

2024-06-21Art 25(1)(b)157
000122955

vs Jun Yu

2024-02-26Art 25(1)(b)157
000120382

vs Jan Ładny

2024-01-09Art 25(1)(b)157
000119103

vs DYSON TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

2023-12-19Art 25(1)(b)157
000119138

vs DYSON TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

2023-12-19Art 25(1)(b)157