DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005302817-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-08

000103239

Contested design: 005302817-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005302817-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Metal-Bud II Robert Gubałavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Bielowicza 76, 32-040 Świątniki Górne, Poland

Represented by

Marek Mikosza

Holder · RCD owner

Alubrass Ewa Bartoszvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Ślusarska 8, 32-440 Sułkowice, Poland

Prior art cited (3)

CatalogD1

'DECO handle' design shown on the front page of the 2017 EGO LINE handles catalogue

EGO LINE handles · EGO LINE handles catalogue

CatalogD2

'DECO handle' design shown on page 5 of the 2017 EGO LINE handles catalogue

EGO LINE handles · EGO LINE handles catalogue

CatalogD3

'DECO handle' design shown on page 89 of the 2016 ERKADO your doors – your house catalogue

ERKADO your doors – your house · ERKADO your doors – your house catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier 'DECO handle' designs disclosed in 2016 and 2017 catalogues before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the catalogue extracts as solid evidence of prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR, but found the differences from the prior designs sufficient to preserve novelty.
  • It held that the shared L-shape, square back plate, central square, and raised decorative element dominated the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088