DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004495281-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-25

000011064

Contested design: 004495281-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004495281-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Allergan Holdings France SAS

France (FR)

12, Place de la Defense, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Holder · RCD owner

Dermavita Company ltdvia PDF extraction

LB

Corniche Mazraa, General Street, Al Jichy Building (Lebanon Gulf Bank) – 4th Floor, Beirut, Lebanon

Represented by

Krasimira Kadieva

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

logos; graphic symbols; surface patterns; ornamentation

Community design No 002689687-0001 · Office designs bulletin · disclosed 2015-05-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 4(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on the holder's earlier Community design No 002689687-0001 and additional absolute and earlier-right grounds.
  • The holder argued the informed user was highly attentive, minor differences in wording and layout were enough, and the case should be stayed because related trade mark and invalidity proceedings were pending.
  • The Division refused a stay, treated the earlier published Community design as disclosed under Article 7(1), and found designer freedom for logos was broad.
  • It held the added 'BEAUTY TOOLS' rectangle played a secondary role, so the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier design and lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000011068

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011084

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011081

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011077

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011067

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011072

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011075

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011080

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212