DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004495281-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-26

000011069

Contested design: 004495281-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004495281-0007 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Allergan Holdings France SAS

France (FR)

12, Place de la Defense, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Holder · RCD owner

JUVEDERM Elite Clinics S.A.R.L.via PDF extraction

LB

Corniche Mazraa — Lebanon Gulf bank — 4th Floor, Beirut, Lebanon

Represented by

Krasimira Kadieva

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

logos; graphic symbols and logos, surface patterns, ornamentation

RCD No 002689687-0001 · Office designs bulletin · disclosed 2015-05-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on the holder's earlier RCD No 002689687-0001 and also invoking other grounds.
  • The holder argued the informed user was attentive, minor differences sufficed given limited design freedom, and requested a stay because related trade mark and invalidity proceedings were pending.
  • The Invalidity Division refused a stay, found the earlier RCD properly disclosed through publication, and held logo designers enjoy broad freedom so small additions do not materially alter overall impression.
  • The Division found the contested sign's added rectangular 'ELITE CLINICS' element secondary to the identical elliptical 'JUVEDERM' logo, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000011068

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011084

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011081

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011077

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011067

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011072

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011075

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011080

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212