DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004495281-0012

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-26

000011074

Contested design: 004495281-0012

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004495281-0012 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Allergan Holdings France SAS

France (FR)

12, Place de la Defense, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Holder · RCD owner

Dermavita Company ltdvia PDF extraction

LB

Corniche Mazraa, General Street, Al Jichy Building (Lebanon Gulf Bank) – 4th Floor, Beirut, Lebanon

Represented by

Krasimira Kadieva

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

JUVEDERM logo design

Community design No 002689687-0001 · Office designs bulletin · disclosed 2015-05-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested JUVEDERM STYLE logo lacked novelty and individual character over the holder's earlier published JUVEDERM logo design and also invoked additional grounds.
  • The holder argued the added STYLE banner, wording differences, and asserted colour contrast changed the overall impression, and also requested a stay.
  • The Division rejected the stay request, accepted the earlier Office publication as prior disclosure, and considered logo design freedom to be very broad.
  • It found the shared elliptical JUVEDERM logo dominated both designs and that the added STYLE rectangle was only secondary information, leaving the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld on lack of individual character, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000011068

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011084

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011081

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011077

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011067

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011072

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011075

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011080

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212