DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004495281-0021

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-26

000011083

Contested design: 004495281-0021

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 004495281-0021 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004495281-0021 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Allergan Holdings France SAS

France (FR)

12, Place de la Defense, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Holder · RCD owner

Dermavita Company ltdvia PDF extraction

LB

Corniche Mazraa, General Street, Al Jichy Building (Lebanon Gulf Bank) – 4th Floor, Beirut, Lebanon

Represented by

Krasimira Kadieva

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

logos; graphic symbols and logos; surface patterns; ornamentation

Community design No 002689687-0001 · Office designs bulletin · disclosed 2015-05-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on the holder's earlier RCD No 002689687-0001 and prior use of the word element 'JUVEDERM'.
  • The holder argued the informed user was highly attentive, the designer's freedom was limited, the compared logos created different overall impressions, and the proceedings should be stayed.
  • The Invalidity Division refused a stay, found the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed through publication, and treated logo design freedom as broadly unrestricted.
  • It held the added 'LAB' rectangle was secondary, the ellipse and 'JUVEDERM' element dominated both designs, and the contested RCD lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000011068

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011084

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011081

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011077

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011067

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011072

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011075

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212
000011080

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a), Art 25(1)(e)3212