DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005277084-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-27

000103741

Contested design: 005277084-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 0052770840001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

La demande en nullité est accueillie. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº0052770840001 est déclaré nul. La titulaire supporte les frais exposés par la demanderesse, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

S.C. Urban Invest S.R.L.

Romania (RO)

Strada Stefan Baciu, Nr. 2, Ap. 1, Municipiul Brasov, jud. Brasov, Roumanie

Holder · RCD owner

Urban Buildngvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Saucesti, Judetul Bacau, Saucesti, Roumanie

Represented by

Bogdan Alecu

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

figurative trademark

Romanian trademark No 139 240 · Romania · disclosed 2015-04-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity because the contested logo design conflicted with its earlier Romanian figurative trademark and allegedly lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division assessed Article 25(1)(e) CDR, found the signs similar around the dominant element "URBAN", and considered the covered products identical because the contested design was a logo applicable to any product.
  • It found a likelihood of confusion and concluded that the applicant could prohibit use of the contested design under its earlier trademark rights.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000101919

vs TELEHOUSE

2019-07-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000011077

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000011081

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000011075

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000011067

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000011072

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210
000011068

vs DERMAVITA COMPANY ltd

2019-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(e)3210