DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002824540-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-05

000101539

Contested design: 002824540-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No. 002824540-0003 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 002824540-0003 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

PMR Handelsgesellschaft mbH

Germany (DE)

Fennstr. 1, 12439 Berlin, Deutschland

Represented by

Kanzlei Plüschke

Michael Plüschke

Holder · RCD owner

Soma Group d.o.o.

RS

Terazije 42, 11000 Beograd, Serbien

Represented by

Eikel & Partner

Prior art cited (1)

National design

sofa design

40 2009 004 636-0001 · DPMA register extract · disclosed 2010-07-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier German design No. 40 2009 004 636-0001, and also invoked conflict with an earlier right.
  • The holder argued the request should be rejected because the compared sofa designs created completely different overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier German design but found multiple visible differences, so the contested design had individual character and was not identical to the earlier design.
  • The invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) and 25(1)(d) failed, so the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000101520

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)0610
000101480

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)0610
000107779

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-04-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000105800

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000108302

vs INTER LINK SAS

2020-01-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102339

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000010933

vs Fatboy the Original B.V.

2019-02-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068