DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003521053-0013

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-25

000011197

Contested design: 003521053-0013

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003521053-0013 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Calitex S.A.

France (FR)

70, rue de Douai, 59405 Cambrai Cedex, France

Represented by

David Lefranc

Holder · RCD owner

Van Der Haegen & Neckebroeck, BVBAvia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Pamelstraat Oost 450, 9400 Ninove, Belgium

Represented by

Christian Defauw

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog⚠ rejected as evidence

plastic tablecloth design marketed as 'Graphisme'

TB 1636 · Manhing catalogue for 2014-2015

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)Article 7(2)Article 7(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested tablecloth design lacked novelty and later individual character because the same design had been disclosed and marketed by Chinese suppliers before 15 December 2016.
  • Holder said it had commissioned the design earlier, only authorised manufacture, never transferred design rights, and that the applicant's evidence did not prove a public disclosure attributable to a third party.
  • The Division held the alleged manufacturer-to-manufacturer transfer and later 2016 acts were either confidential or covered by the Article 7 grace-period derogation for unauthorised disclosures.
  • The remaining 2014-2015 Manhing catalogue pages were not sufficiently reliable or proven to have reached the relevant EU sector, so prior disclosure was not established and the application failed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105119

vs C&G Household Products Limited

2020-03-04Invalidity application rejected326
000011193

vs VAN DER HAEGEN & NECKEBROECK, bvba

2019-07-19Invalidity application rejected326
000011061

vs SOFIDEL S.P.A.

2018-12-19Invalidity application rejected326
000011060

vs SOFIDEL S.P.A.

2018-12-18Invalidity application rejected326
000010617

vs Naketano GmbH

2018-10-16Invalidity application rejected326
000010546

vs CRISTIAN PETROVICI

2018-07-10Invalidity application rejected326
000010730

vs BEVERAGES Mark Limited

2018-06-08Invalidity application rejected326
000116999

vs Kai Collective Ltd

2023-07-13325