DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004688414-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-11-07

000103139

Contested design: 004688414-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004688414-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno – Handlowe ‘Wena – Prod’ s.c. K. Mróz, M. Romaniecvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Jagiellońska, nr 101, lok. 56, 25734 Kielce, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

RODLEW QMD Sp. z o. o.

Poland (PL)

Ul. Przemysłowa 4c, 44-203 Rybnik, Poland

Represented by

Abapat. Kancelaria Patentowa

Magdalena Tyrała

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAttachment No 4

set of letters, numbers and symbols for ornaments or votive gifts

Caggiati catalogue, page 484 · Caggiati catalogue (2013)

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7Article 8(1)Article 4(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Caggiati catalogue disclosures and also invoked Articles 8(1) and 4(2) CDR.
  • Holder argued the contested design was a set of ornamental and votive articles, not a typeface, and that differences in letters, cross, pins, colours and expert opinions showed individual character.
  • The Division found the 2013 Caggiati catalogue disclosed the prior design, treated the contested RCD as a whole set of ornaments, and rejected the Article 8(1) and Article 4(2) objections as unsubstantiated.
  • Because the shared letters, numbers and symbols created the same overall impression despite minor differences, the Division declared the contested RCD invalid and awarded costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130246

vs Giuliana FERRAROTTI

2026-05-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000131904

vs Lang Huang

2026-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126958

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126957

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126956

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126975

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000127536

vs Shuxun Dai

2025-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000124515

vs Heinrich Braun

2025-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118