Invalidity · first instance · 2019-12-12
000104079
Contested design: 005253069-0001
Outcome
The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005253069-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005253069-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Framery Oy
Finland (FI)
Patamäenkatu 7, 33900 Tampere, Finland
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Suzhou 3DS Engineering Procurement Construction Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction
China (CN)
Taiping Industrial Park, Xiangcheng District, Suzhou 215131, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
telephone boxes
Community design registration No 002393793-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-01-30
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing the contested telephone booth closely reproduced its earlier Community design.
- ›The holder filed no observations in reply.
- ›The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, identified a fairly broad design freedom, and focused the comparison on the protected booth features.
- ›It found the door framing, frame geometry, and overall visual robustness created a different overall impression on the informed user.
- ›The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
- MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000105879 vs Bernhard Hirsch | 2020-02-04 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104699 vs DACHPOL Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością | 2020-01-30 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104060 vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd. | 2019-12-12 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104059 vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd. | 2019-12-12 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106280 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106281 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106300 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106301 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |