DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005588019-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-12-12

000105159

Contested design: 005588019-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005588019-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Helmut Pauliks

Germany (DE)

Von-der-Helm-Straße 110, 41199 Mönchengladbach, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Ningbo Ontime Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1302 No 1 Building High-tech development plaza No 1498, Jiangnan Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

OtherAnnexes 1-3⚠ rejected as evidence

fan heater allegedly exhibited at the 123rd Canton Fair

Booth number 15.3I06-07 · 123rd Canton Fair

PatentAnnex 4⚠ rejected as evidence

fan heater

Chinese design patent No ZL 2018 3 0110335.8 · China · disclosed 2018-08-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an allegedly earlier fan heater shown at the 123rd Canton Fair and on a Chinese design patent.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the Canton Fair evidence incomplete and unreliable, with photos too limited to establish public disclosure or permit a proper design comparison.
  • The Chinese design patent was published only on 2018-08-28, after the contested RCD filing date of 2018-08-09, so it could not prove prior disclosure.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109541

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109481

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109521

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109561

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109461

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000107040

vs Shenzhen Walikexun Information Technology Co., Ltd.

2019-11-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000102499

vs Erwin Müller GmbH

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000102262

vs Erwin Müller GmbH

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238