DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003760123-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-01-28

000104180

Contested design: 003760123-0003

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0037601230003 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Stuff & Things Ltd.via PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Unit 3005-7, 30/F Saxon Tower 7 Cheung Shun Street, Hong Kong

Represented by

Annika Romano

Holder · RCD owner

Alanui S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Via D. Manin 13, 20121 Milano, Italia

Prior art cited (4)

Web disclosureD1

cardigan

www.vogue.it/collezioni -autunno-inverno-2014-15 · Vogue.it

Web disclosureD2

cardigan shown in Instagram screenshot

Instagram · disclosed 2016-10-04

Web disclosureD3

cardigan shown in Instagram screenshot

Instagram · disclosed 2016-11-22

Web disclosureD4

cardigan shown in Instagram screenshot

Instagram · disclosed 2016-12-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing the cardigan had been disclosed earlier through Instagram posts and earlier fashion references inspired by Native American motifs.
  • The holder argued the cited earlier designs either were not properly dated or relevant, and that the contested cardigan's fringes, decoration layout, and color combinations created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure only for four earlier web or Instagram examples, but found the applicant's other exhibits undated, insufficiently identifiable, outside the EU market context, or introduced too late.
  • Comparing the disclosed earlier cardigans with the contested design, the Division found clear differences in decoration placement, colors, and fringe configuration, so the contested RCD retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027