DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001869223-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-13

000105501

Contested design: 001869223-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0018692230002 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0018692230002 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

A.M.O.S. Design s.ro.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Beethvenova 641/9, 60200 Brno, Repubblica Ceca

Represented by

Oktavian Kocian

Holder · RCD owner

FI.MA di Masini e Figli S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Via Maresciallo Tito 65/A, Montecavolo di Quattro Castella (RE), Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested RCD was only a generic scheme suggesting a final product and therefore did not satisfy the definition of a design under Article 3(a) CDR.
  • The holder replied that the registration views clearly showed a modular bench design, that their simplicity reflected the product's geometry, and that the representations complied with common practice for design views.
  • The Division held that the applicant had provided no concrete facts or evidence showing that the contested RCD failed to meet Article 3 CDR and treated the Prague court case as irrelevant to the invalidity ground.
  • The applicant's later individual-character argument was rejected as raised too late, so the Article 25(1)(a) invalidity claim failed and the application was dismissed with costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105499

vs FI.MA di Masini e Figli S.r.l.

2020-02-07Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(a)067
000010854

vs Ningbo Beidou Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2018-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(a)067
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13065
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12065
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06065
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16065
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27065
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27065