DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006647830-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-21

000108123

Contested design: 006647830-0007

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 006647830-0007 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vahdet Akardenizvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Schaberfeld 22, 42659 Solingen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Ejoy law Group, Ltd.via PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

185 Ashfield Avenue, Atherton Manchester M46 0HD, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

chair

ASIN B01D3WYN1I · amazon.de · disclosed 2016-03-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on a chair allegedly disclosed on amazon.de on 17/03/2016 before the contested RCD's filing date.
  • The applicant argued the earlier design identified as ASIN B01D3WYN1I was identical in all material features to the contested chair design.
  • The holder submitted no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the internet extracts and product information were out of context and did not reliably prove the claimed prior design was publicly disclosed on the asserted date.
  • Because disclosure under Article 7 CDR was not proven, the Article 25(1)(b) and Article 5 novelty challenge failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12Art 25(1)(b)067
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000121199

vs MANUTTI BVBA

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000120918

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120869

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120920

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067
000120919

vs Sergiy Fatkulayev

2024-03-27Art 25(1)(b)067